Now why would he do that?
Even when, via a Google search, we find a page on a topic that (at least at the
time) interests us, it's usually quite easy to find something out about the site
upon which it resides. More often than not, we'll find a link at the bottom of
the page in question that takes us back (if that's the right word) to a
higher level page on the site. If that doesn't work, we can usually find another
link on the page that brings us to a page that in turn will lead us somewhere.
And when even that doesn't help, we can easily move up a level by removing the
ending of the URL. From that main page we'll usually be able to find a link back
to the page we came from. With the
particular page in question, that last option was the only option, but the
main page didn't seem to have any links that might bring us to the page we'd found
on Google.
This particular page makes the interesting observation that "under construction"
signs are frequently images that suggest physical labor, even though there's no
real connection between building a web page and working on a building construction
site. It's a well argued page, and thus somewhat strange that there seems to be
no way of getting to it from the main page of the site. I don't know whether this
was an oversight, or was perhaps even purposeful. Perhaps it's a construction
mistake - the person who prepared the site originally linked to the page, and
then, when he changed his main page left out a link to the page I found. Whichever,
it was an interesting read.
Go to: The history of being unfinished, or
Go to: On completing a web site