|
Get our Bad Breath Research Newsletter!
|
|
|
|
2nd. Edition
Table 2.
Pearson Correlation Coefficients
Comparing Each Student's Scores with the Class Mean a.
Judge no. |
N |
Correlation coefficient
(r= ) |
Probability
(p) |
1 |
20 |
0.26 |
>0.05 |
2 |
20 |
0.29 |
>0.05 |
3 |
20 |
0.40 |
<0.05 |
4 |
20 |
0.40 |
<0.05 |
5 |
20 |
0.41 |
<0.05 |
6 |
20 |
0.42 |
<0.05 |
7 |
20 |
0.49 |
<0.025 |
8 |
19 |
0.50 |
<0.025 |
9 |
20 |
0.57 |
<0.01 |
10 |
20 |
0.60 |
<0.01 |
11 |
20 |
0.61 |
<0.0025 |
12 |
20 |
0.63 |
<0.0025 |
13 |
19 |
0.65 |
<0.0025 |
14 |
20 |
0.65 |
<0.0025 |
15 |
19 |
0.66 |
<0.0025 |
16 |
20 |
0.66 |
<0.0025 |
17 |
20 |
0.71 |
<0.0005 |
18 |
20 |
0.73 |
<0.0005 |
19 |
20 |
0.76 |
<0.0005 |
20 |
20 |
0.77 |
<0.0005 |
21 |
20 |
0.81 |
<0.0005 |
MR b |
21 |
0.72 |
<0.0005 |
a
Undergraduate dental students (N=21) were asked to smell each other's whole mouth malodor
and to rate each score in a blind fashion, on a semi-integer scale of 0-5, with two minute
pauses between measurements (Rosenberg et al., 1991b).
Pearson linear regression analysis was carried out comparing each student's set of
valuations with the mean class scores.
b
Scores (N=21) were concomitantly carried out by an experienced judge of oral malodor (MR).
|
|