No more "we".
Many early internet users heralded the arrival of the "netizen"
- the user who, even though he or she was sitting in front of his or her personal
computer at home, was somehow part of a vast community of users that possessed
an awareness of, and a desire to be part of, that community. Instead of taking
to the streets, "the people" took to their PCs. Only the venue had changed
- the sense of community remained.
But that's only one possible perspective
on that transition. Another would suggest that even before we started reaching
out to the world via the internet, any actual semblance of community had become
particularized. What may have been a collection of individuals who through a common
interest became, at least for a fleeting moment,
a movement, broke up into highly categorized interest groups, groups with their
own axes to grind and little ability to go beyond their particularlist interests
in order to remain a movement.
The internet seems surprisingly well-suited
for these particularist, one-cause, groups. Within the vast expanses of cyberspace
any group can find even a handful of like-minded people to form a "community".
The internet allows us to pick and choose our own mini-crowd. And each mini-crowd
thinks that its decisions are wise ones because they stem from a crowd, regardless
of the fact that the crowd was defined in advance as one that would make particular
decisions.
Go to: Are crowds really that smart?